Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This dashboard provides a useful overview of unpaid care across England and Wales using Census data. It highlights the scale of unpaid care and the important role carers play in supporting people with long-term conditions, disabilities and older age. 

One of the main strengths of the tool is its ability to show how unpaid care varies across different places. Users can explore differences between local authorities and see how patterns of care have changed over time. This helps identify where demand for support may be higher and where services may need to be adapted. 

The dashboard also shows how unpaid care is linked to wider social and economic factors. For example, it allows comparison of carers’ health, employment and education with the general population. This helps highlight how caring responsibilities can affect people’s lives, including their ability to work or maintain good health. 

From a care equity perspective, the dashboard is essential because it makes visible the uneven distribution of unpaid care. Some areas and population groups provide more care than others, often alongside higher levels of disadvantage. Without targeted support, this can contribute to inequities in both carer wellbeing and access to formal services. 

Overall, the tool supports better use of data in planning and decision-making. By improving understanding of who unpaid carers are and where they are located, it can help inform more equitable and responsive health and social care services. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This study provides a detailed account of how care work is organised and experienced within residential homes for older people. By focusing on everyday routines and interactions, it shows how care quality emerges from the interaction between resources, organisational culture and staff practice. 

The findings emphasise that good care is not solely a function of individual commitment. Workforce culture and material conditions shape what care workers are able to do, how time is prioritised and how responsibilities are distributed across teams. 

From a care equity perspective, the study highlights how under-resourcing and time constraints can create uneven care experiences for residents. When staff are required to ration time or negotiate unclear responsibilities, some residents may receive more attentive care than others. These dynamics reflect broader inequities in how care is funded and organised, rather than individual failings of workers. 

Overall, the paper stresses the importance of viewing workforce conditions as central to equitable care. Ensuring fair allocation of time, clarity of roles and adequate resources is essential if residential care homes are to provide consistent and dignified care for all residents.

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This report provides a stark account of the financial realities faced by residential care workers in the UK. By documenting high levels of poverty and food insecurity, it challenges assumptions that employment in care provides a stable route out of deprivation. 

The findings highlight how poor pay and insecure conditions are embedded within the structure of residential care. As demand for care grows, these conditions risk undermining recruitment and retention, placing further strain on an already stretched workforce. 

For care equity, the report exposes a contradiction at the heart of the care system. Workers who provide essential support to older and vulnerable people are themselves disproportionately affected by poverty and deprivation. These disparities are not incidental but reflect how care work is valued and funded, with implications for workforce wellbeing and continuity of care. 

Overall, the report argues that improving outcomes for people who draw on residential care cannot be separated from improving the living and working conditions of the workforce. Addressing poverty among care workers is a prerequisite for building a fair, resilient and sustainable adult social care system. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This study provides insight into how paid care workers in England understand their working conditions and the role of organising in addressing long-standing challenges. Participants described organising as both a response to low pay and poor conditions and a way of asserting professional identity within a marginalised sector. 

The findings show that care workers often feel disconnected from decision-making structures that shape their work. Organising activities were framed as efforts to make everyday realities visible to employers and policymakers, rather than solely as formal union activity. 

Considering care equity, the study highlights how unequal power within the workforce affects both workers and the people they support. When care workers’ voices are excluded from policy and practice, inequities in pay, security and conditions are sustained. These workforce inequities have downstream effects on continuity and quality of care, particularly in a sector employing large numbers of women and people from marginalised groups. 

Overall, the paper suggests that supporting care worker voices is not only a labour issue but a care issue. Strengthening avenues for collective input may contribute to fairer working conditions and a more equitable and stable care system. 

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This paper looks at how digital technology is changing mental health care. It shows that more people are using the internet and smartphones to find information, track their symptoms and access support. For some people, this can make it easier to get help, especially if they feel uncomfortable with face-to-face services or live in areas with limited provision. 

However, access to digital care is not equal. While many people now use the internet regularly, not everyone has the same level of access, confidence or skills. Some people may not have reliable internet or devices, while others may struggle to use digital tools. This creates a risk that digital approaches could widen existing inequities if they are not designed and implemented carefully. 

The paper also highlights concerns from staff and service users. Some worry that digital tools could reduce human contact or be used as a cheaper alternative to proper care. Others are concerned about how personal data is collected and used. These concerns can affect trust and willingness to engage with digital services. 

Another key issue is the gap between how quickly digital tools are being developed and how slowly they are evaluated. Many tools are introduced before there is strong evidence on how well they work or who they work best for. This makes it harder for services to know which tools to adopt. 

From a health and social care equity perspective, digital technology has both potential and risk. It can improve access by reaching people in their everyday lives and offering flexible support. At the same time, if issues like digital exclusion, workforce readiness and trust are not addressed, it may reinforce existing inequities. 

Overall, the paper suggests that digital mental health care should be developed alongside, not instead of, wider investment in services and support. A balanced approach is needed so that technology improves access without reducing the quality or equity of care. 

Key Stats: 

Key Messages 

Commentary 

This paper highlights the increasing pressures faced by the social care workforce due to limited capacity and insufficient administrative support. Staff report burnout from covering understaffed shifts, receiving low pay, and being unable to take annual leave without burdening their colleagues. These conditions compromise staff wellbeing and restrict their ability to move beyond crisis management, limiting opportunities for training, skill development, and career progression. While staff remain committed to meeting the needs of those who draw on care and support, the current staff-to-service ratios are unsustainable. Many report having less time to provide personalised care, with the shortfall directly impacting people who are drawing on services. This is recognised as a national issue, not just an organisational one, with widespread capacity challenges across the sector. 

This article calls for urgent action to address workforce capacity, improve training, and support newly qualified social workers, who experience particularly high turnover rates. Current practice falls short of BASW’s guidance, which recommends 80% of time spent engaging with service users and 20% on administration. Limitations of the study include a homogeneous sample in regards to ethnicity and an overrepresentation of respondents from Northern Ireland. Additionally, authors note that findings may not be representative of all social workers, as those who responded to open-ended questions likely held strong views on the issues discussed. 

Key Statistics: 

Key Messages 

Commentary 

Particular focus should be given to members of the workforce within all job roles who indicated that they were only slightly confident or not confident at all in the use of technology. The authors tell us that although the majority of responses are positive, it is clear that there is a proportion of the workforce who would benefit from increased training in the use of technology. This is critical to ensure that every member of the workforce is able to benefit from the potential of digital learning and development and that a digital divide is not created. These findings suggest that offering training to increase digital skills and technology confidence, in addition to raising awareness of the benefits of the use of technology for learning and development, may increase the overall engagement with digital learning and development solutions.