Everyday use and personalisation of assistive technology in dementia

A study examining how people with dementia and their family carers use, adapt and abandon assistive technology and technology-enabled care in everyday life.

Key messages

  • people with dementia and carers actively adapt and repurpose assistive technologies to fit daily routines
  • technologies are often abandoned when they do not align with lived experience or changing needs
  • unintended consequences of assistive technology use are common
  • successful use depends on contextual tailoring at home and routine level
  • many assistive technology products lack flexibility to accommodate progression of dementia.

Policy implications

  • assistive technology provision should prioritise personalisation and adaptability
  • ongoing, longitudinal support is needed rather than one-off installation
  • service models should recognise carers’ role in adapting and maintaining technology
  • procurement should consider how technologies evolve alongside changing needs.

Gaps

  • limited longitudinal evidence on sustained assistive technology use
  • lack of flexible product design that supports progression of dementia
  • insufficient integration of ethnographic insights into commissioning and practice.

Commentary
This study provides rich insight into how assistive technology is used in real-world dementia care. Rather than being passively adopted, technologies are actively adapted, modified or abandoned depending on how well they fit with everyday routines and relationships.

From a care equity viewpoint, the findings challenge assumptions that technology alone can provide support. Without tailoring, ongoing support and responsiveness to changing needs, assistive technologies may fail to deliver intended benefits and can even create new burdens.

The concept of ‘bricolage’ highlights the work done by carers to make technologies usable. This ‘invisible work’ is rarely recognised in service design or commissioning, yet it is central to whether technology supports or disrupts care.

Overall, the study stresses that the use of technology in care must be grounded in lived experience. Personalisation, flexibility and longitudinal support are essential if assistive technology is to support people with dementia and their carers equitably and sustainably.

Aenean posuere tortor sed cursus

Morbi vestibulum volutpat enim. Suspendisse eu ligula.

Underserved populations

Unmet need, epistemic injustice and early death among Autistic adults

Analysis examining how social policies in England and Wales fail to address the needs of Autistic adults, focusing on barriers in health services and social care systems.

Underserved populations

Systemic safety inequities for people with learning disabilities

A study examining safety inequities experienced by people with learning disabilities in English health and social care, drawing on lived experiences from focus groups and patient feedback narratives.

Underserved populations

Solutions to reduce inequities in dementia diagnosis and care

A systematic review examining interventions designed to reduce inequities in dementia diagnosis and post-diagnostic care across multiple countries, focusing on individual, community and health system solutions.

Workforce

Newly qualified social workers and anti-racist practice in England

A qualitative study examining how newly qualified social workers in England experience and respond to racism in practice, and how social work education prepares them to challenge racism in health and social care contexts.

Underserved populations

Addressing inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care 

A national study exploring practical solutions to reduce inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care across England, drawing on workshops with people with dementia, carers, professionals and third sector organisations.

Underserved populations

Inequities in dementia services for Black and minoritised communities in the UK

A policy-focused review examining barriers to dementia care access for Black and minoritised communities in the UK, highlighting gaps between national policy ambitions and local service delivery.