Safety risks in online primary care consultations

An analysis of patient safety risks associated with remote consultations in UK primary care and strategies to mitigate harm.

Key messages

  • remote consultations introduce specific patient safety risks compared with face-to-face care
  • risks include missed visual and contextual cues and limitations on physical examination
  • communication challenges can be amplified for some patient groups
  • clinicians use mitigation strategies such as safety-netting, follow-up and selective face-to-face review
  • safety risks may disproportionately affect underserved populations with communication or access barriers.

Policy implications

  • remote consultation models should include explicit safety protocols
  • clinicians need flexibility to switch between remote and in-person care
  • training should address communication and risk assessment in remote settings
  • patient safety considerations should be integrated into digital access policy and service design.

Gaps

  • limited evidence on how safety risks vary across different patient groups
  • lack of data on trade-offs between access, safety and equity
  • need for further research on which populations are most affected by remote consultation risks.

Commentary
This paper highlights that the use of technology in care brings distinct patient safety challenges, particularly in remote primary care consultations. While remote access can improve convenience, it can also reduce clinicians’ ability to assess subtle cues or conduct physical examinations.

In terms of care equity, these risks are not evenly distributed. Patients with communication difficulties, language barriers or complex needs may be more vulnerable to harm in remote settings, especially if digital consultations become routine.

The study highlights the importance of mitigation strategies such as clear safety-netting and the option of in-person review. These approaches recognise that remote care should be adaptive rather than uniform.

Overall, the findings reinforce the need for balanced digital strategies. The use of technology in care must carefully weigh safety and equity alongside access, ensuring that digital delivery enhances care without increasing risk for already underserved groups.

Aenean posuere tortor sed cursus

Morbi vestibulum volutpat enim. Suspendisse eu ligula.

Underserved populations

Unmet need, epistemic injustice and early death among Autistic adults

Analysis examining how social policies in England and Wales fail to address the needs of Autistic adults, focusing on barriers in health services and social care systems.

Underserved populations

Systemic safety inequities for people with learning disabilities

A study examining safety inequities experienced by people with learning disabilities in English health and social care, drawing on lived experiences from focus groups and patient feedback narratives.

Underserved populations

Solutions to reduce inequities in dementia diagnosis and care

A systematic review examining interventions designed to reduce inequities in dementia diagnosis and post-diagnostic care across multiple countries, focusing on individual, community and health system solutions.

Workforce

Newly qualified social workers and anti-racist practice in England

A qualitative study examining how newly qualified social workers in England experience and respond to racism in practice, and how social work education prepares them to challenge racism in health and social care contexts.

Underserved populations

Addressing inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care 

A national study exploring practical solutions to reduce inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care across England, drawing on workshops with people with dementia, carers, professionals and third sector organisations.

Underserved populations

Inequities in dementia services for Black and minoritised communities in the UK

A policy-focused review examining barriers to dementia care access for Black and minoritised communities in the UK, highlighting gaps between national policy ambitions and local service delivery.