The first annual report by Baroness Finlay, the chair of the National Mental Capacity Forum, which provides details of the forum’s membership and its early work and achievements to implement the Mental Capacity Act. It also highlights some of the challenges raised by people implementing the Mental Capacity Act where further progress is needed. The Chair’s priorities to strengthen the implementation of the Act for the following year cover: hearing the voice of the person, improving practitioners understanding of the Mental Capacity Act, improved support for carers of people with impaired capacity, and to reduce and prevent the exploitation of vulnerable people by financial and other scams.

This code of practice provides guidance to mental health professionals and other practitioners on how they should carry out their duties under the Mental Health Act. As well as providing guidance for professionals, the revised code of practice also guides patients, their families and carers on their rights. Chapters are grouped into seven areas: Using the Act; Protecting patient’s rights and autonomy; Assessment, transport and admission to hospital; Additional considerations for the needs of specific patients; Care, support and treatment in hospital; Leaving hospital; and additional information for professional with specific responsibilities under the Act. Subjects covered in individual chapters include: the nearest relative; independent mental health advocates; mental capacity and deprivation of liberty; detention in hospital; police community treatment orders; guardianship; after care; and care programme approach. The code of practice will come into force on 1 April 2015, depending on Parliamentary approval.

This guide is intended for bereaved people and others who may be affected by a coroner investigation or are attending a coroner’s inquest. The guide provides bereaved people with an explanation of the coroner investigation and inquest process as well as links to other organisations that may also provide help and advice. Whilst the guide is focused on bereaved people, it will also be useful for others, including other interested persons and witnesses as well as members of the public who want to understand coroner processes. The guide includes a protocol of key principles which applies when a government department has interested person status in an inquest. The protocol aims to ensure that the department recognises the need for bereaved people to be involved throughout the inquest process. The guide is not intended as a statement of the law and does not cover every situation that might arise.

Assessment of the amendment, which introduced the liberty protection safeguards to replace the deprivation of liberty safeguards. the liberty protection safeguards (LPS) were introduced in the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019. LPS will provide the framework to determine whether a deprivation of liberty is necessary and proportionate for the care or treatment of an individual who lacks the mental capacity to consent to their arrangements, in England and Wales. They will replace the deprivation of liberty safeguards (DoLS) system, which was found to be “bureaucratic” and “too complex” by a House of Lords Committee in 2014. This impact assessment is an updated assessment of the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019. It provides an assessment of DoLS at present and fully funded, as well as for LPS as set out in the act.

This framework aims to assist professionals, and specifically staff working within Gateshead, to understand their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act and to access guidance to assist them in fulfilling them. The document is separated into four main parts: policy – this section outlines the policy structures which underpin MCA practice in Gateshead, including a detailed glossary of terms, the legal context, exploration of the role of the CQC and a discussion of how clear MCA leadership can be structured within individual agencies; considerations for particular agencies – this section examines the impact of the MCA on specific agencies within Gateshead and considers some of the challenges presented; MCA practice and procedural guidance – this section considers specific elements and functions of the MCA, and offers practice and procedural guidance; and DoLS procedural guidance – this section sets out Gateshead’s procedure for the effective operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

Annual report and fees forms and guidance for anyone appointed as a deputy.

This introductory guide is for people detained under sections 2 and 3 of the Mental Health Act, or people who are in hospital as a voluntary patient. A voluntary patient (also called an informal patient) is someone who is in hospital but is not detained under the Mental Health Act. Sections cover: why am I being detained; how should the decision to detain me be made; your right to speak to an independent mental health advocate; what can you or your nearest relative do if you think that you shouldn’t be in hospital; and additional guidance for those who need to stay in hospital and extra help for disabled people.

This introductory guide is for people detained under section 35, 36, 37, 37/41, 38, 45A, 47, 47/49, 48 or 48/49 of the Mental Health Act. These are people who are suspected or have been convicted of a crime and the courts and doctors have decided that they need to stay in a mental health hospital to get support and care for their mental health condition. The guide explains what rights individuals have and what should happen to them at different stages through their journey in hospital. There are six parts to this guide. The first four parts (A-D) relate to the different stages of stay in hospital in time order, covering: the decision to detain; being detained in hospital; staying in hospital; and leaving hospital. Part E explains how to make a complaint at any stage of one’s stay in hospital; and Part F explains some of the key terms used in this document.

This introductory guide is for people detained under section 35, 36, 37, 37/41, 38, 45A, 47, 47/49, 48 or 48/49 of the Mental Health Act. These are people who are suspected or have been convicted of a crime and the courts and doctors have decided that they need to stay in a mental health hospital to get support and care for their mental health condition. The guide explains what their rights are and what should happen to them at different stages through their journey in hospital. Sections cover: which section of the Mental Health Act can I be detained under; how should the decision to detain me be made; your right to speak to an independent mental health advocate; what can you or your nearest relative do if you think that you shouldn’t be in hospital; and additional guidance for people who need to stay in hospital and how disabled people can get extra help.

This document is designed to assist practitioners to begin to address the needs of consumers of financial service in vulnerable circumstances. It consolidates tips and resources gained throughout the course of the FCA’s research. The pack is geared towards firm employees tasked with the development of a vulnerable customer policy/strategy.

This annual report on CQC monitoring of the Mental Health Act (MHA) puts a specific focus on the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on patients detained under the MHA, and on the services that care for and treat them. The findings indicate that: planning for individuals’ discharge from hospital continues to be essential and is particularly important during the pandemic period due to the increased burden on all services, including those in the community; some services showed exemplary practice in the co-production of care with patients, including infection control measures; in many services the physical environment requires modernisation and doing so would have the added positive impact of making infection control easier; some services continued to uphold restrictions on patients’ movement, activities and leave for longer than seemed necessary; many services invested in software to help detained patients to stay connected with their family and other sources of support during the pandemic; detained patients’ access to advocacy services was made more difficult during the pandemic, but such services played an even more crucial role where patients’ lives were more limited by infection control measures; there needs to be careful evaluation of using remote technology should aspects of them continue after the pandemic abates.

This document provides guidance in relation to the commissioners’ duty to ensure provider services are delivered in accordance with the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act and that the rights of those who use services are promoted and protected.