The aims of this research project were to further understand Approved Mental Health Professionals (AMHPs) and Best Interests Assessors’ (BIAs) views and feelings on their professional identity (in terms of their regulated profession) and the effect it has on their practice; and the experiences of people who have received services from AMHPs and BIAs, or those who work with them, and whether their experiences and perceptions differ across the professions; and whether BIAs intend to convert their status to AMCP and ways in which this has been influenced. A multimethod research approach was used, comprising a survey qualified and practising AMHPs; a survey of practising BIAs; focus groups of AMHPs and BIAs; interviews with people with experience of Mental Health Act assessments with AMHPs or ASWs. The study found that both the AMHP and BIA workforces are predominantly made up of social workers and predominantly employed by local authorities. Both professions, to varying degrees, believed that their specialist work was advanced, relational and values-based and for many it went beyond an extension of their primary qualification with enhanced legal literacy that was creative and nuanced. Overall, the majority of AMHPs and BIAs believed that social work had the greatest influence on the work. Generally, aspects of social justice and advocacy, as well as a high level of legal literacy, were clear indicators of the contribution of social work to both AMHP and BIA work. AMHPs and BIAs seem to experience very similar impacts on their health and wellbeing arising out of the challenges they experience. The main difference in this area was that AMHPs report finding their role more challenging than BIAs experience which is likely due to workload pressures and a lack of resources which is beyond their control.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to consider the role of social work professional evidence in mental capacity law, specifically Court of Protection proceedings. The authors analyse how social workers perform as evidence givers in this domain and how social work as a profession is perceived alongside other professions within the context of adult social care decision-making in mental capacity law. Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on textual evidence from judgments and existing empirical data published elsewhere. The authors consider the contribution of social work professional expertise to best interests decision-making in formal legal proceedings which, in turn, reflects on how social work expertise is relevant in everyday practice. Findings: The findings of this paper include that social workers are well placed to be experts on best interests decision-making in mental capacity law. However, the authors show that the Court of Protection has not always endorsed this form of social work expertise in its judgments, meaning that social workers can struggle to articulate an expert knowledge base. Originality/value: Overall, the authors conclude that social work evidence is incredibly valuable as expertise about the person’s best interests, particularly in the domain of welfare cases and care planning.

This report looks at some of the common issues and complaints investigated by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman concerning people who lack mental capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) system. The report includes individual case studies to show the impact on people when things go wrong. It estimates that 20 per cent of the 1,212 adult social care complaints investigated by the Ombudsman in the year 2016/17 concerned mental capacity or DoLS. Common issues included: not completing, or delays in carrying out, mental capacity assessments; poor ‘best interests’ decision making; disagreements with the process and failure to involving families; delay in obtaining DoLS authorisations; and failure to carry out full assessments before applying for DoLS. Drawing on the results of investigations, the report provides good practice points to help social care professionals get it right firs time when working with people who may lack mental capacity. It also provides a list of questions to help councillors scrutinise their own authorities.

The key messages from the The Chief Social Worker’s Mental Capacity Act (MCA) Seminar on 13 March 2015. Key themes included: a push on awareness; the importance of local networks and the importance of identifying people and services.