Support and breaks can help young carers ‘not to feel all alone, as if they are drowning and as if there is no escape.
Young carer from a co-production group
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
One of the key differences between services for young carers and adult carers is that young carers’ services aim to give the young carer a break, and reduce inappropriate and/or excessive caring roles on an ongoing basis.
Some levels of caring responsibility are inappropriate for a child or young person – when their development and wellbeing is affected – and the aim of support should be to change this situation, rather than only providing a limited break from it. This requires a whole-family approach.
In England, the Care Act 2014 highlights in law the importance of a whole-family approach as an effective way to understand and address the needs of an individual in the context of their family. Whole-family working involves understanding and addressing the needs of the family as one. This involves:
Evidence shows the benefits of supporting a young carer in the context of their family. By addressing the reasons why a young person is caring and providing support to the person who needs care and the wider family, the role and therefore wellbeing of the young carer can be significantly changed.
The whole-family approach includes:
Co-production is about developing more equal partnerships between people who use services, carers and professionals.
Co-production in the planning, commissioning and delivery of a young carers’ or young adults carers’ service is about:
For more information about co-production, see SCIE guidance.
Co-producing services with young carers and young adult carers can result in better services and better outcomes for all involved. This requires meaningful, not tokenistic involvement which influences strategy, planning, design and delivery. Meaningful co-production should be fully resourced, including training and support, and payments where possible.
One of the major challenges for young carer and young adult carer services is lack of engagement by the carer, lack of permission or interest by parents and short-notice cancellation. By involving young people and families in design and delivery, engagement is more likely.
One method for involving young carers and, particularly, young adult carers is the use of mentoring services, where they can work with a volunteer to plan and deliver outings and activities, alongside and in partnership with a transition worker.
Young carers and young adults carers can also co-produce the evaluation of projects and services by deciding what outcomes are meaningful to them. Pre-intervention questionnaires can be used as a way of getting young carer and young adult carers’ input into services and can also be co-produced with young carers, young adult carers and their families.
Questionnaires must be accessible, particularly for those for whom English is not their first language and for those with learning disabilities.
The aims and outcomes of a break or support will be personal to each carer and the person they care for, but may include:
Practical hints and tips from existing service providers for young carers and young adult carers are as follows.
The impact of being a young carer can have consequences on their emotional and physical wellbeing and prospects later in life. It is important to ensure there is not a ‘cliff edge’ in support services for them as they become an adult.
Transition is the period from 16 to 24 where a young person transitions from child to adult services. For young adults, this is also a time of transitioning from compulsory education to other options for further education, training and employment. In this time a young adult may transition from being a carer to no longer having caring responsibilities, but the impact of their time as a carer still leaves them vulnerable to emotional and financial difficulties. This period of change therefore involves a great number of ‘transitions’ with which young carers may need support.
Further and higher education providers can support learners who are former young carers and young adult carers. This support is often limited and inconsistent and is unlikely to include providing breaks. It usually focuses on educational and potentially emotional support. They can be a part of a wider system of support, however.
Helpful support for young carers in transition include:
Young carers describe the difference made by breaks and support as ‘everything’. They overwhelming agree that the support they received through their local carers service was invaluable to them.
Young carers and young adult carers report that they:
Support and breaks can help young carers ‘not to feel all alone, as if they are drowning and as if there is no escape.
Young carer from a co-production group
Hear from Charlotte, a young person with caring experience. She discusses the difference that breaks for carers can make.
The key barriers to providing good quality short break services for young carers and young adult carers are:
It is unclear at this time what the longer term impact of COVID-19 has had on young carers’ breaks. Some young carers may be supporting an adult who was part of the shielding group and so have particular concerns around COVID-19.
It can be difficult to draw direct causal links between the support interventions and improved outcomes for young carers and young adult carers. Potential solutions might include using proxy measures to show changes in the outcomes for young carers. This might be done using impact measurement and assessment tools such as MACA (multidimensional assessment of caring activities) and PANOC (positive and negative outcomes of caring). Such tools can be embedded into assessments and used in practitioners case work as well.
Other assessments tools that could be used with young carers include WEMWBS (Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale) and Rosenberg self-esteem scale.
Evaluation tools that are used with young carers should be age appropriate. For example:
Evidence of tangible, ‘hard’ outcomes, such as a case being stepped down from a child protection plan, or a school exclusion being prevented, should also be incorporated in monitoring and evaluation activities.
As a minimum, services should measure their baseline (or ‘starting point’) for key indicators, so that any future impact (or ‘distance-travelled’) can be measured against these. Ideally, local authorities or services should implement longitudinal (before and after) measures to assess impact.