The Mental Capacity Act is clearly a camel: so why do many people insist it is a horse?

This opinion piece by a lay former family-carer argues that the MCA is a somewhat ugly camel, not the beautiful horse many people think it is. The author contends the Act never specifies who can be a best-interests decision-maker; it allows a legally-authorised, but crucially not medically or legally trained, layperson to be appointed as a health and welfare attorney and control best-interests decision-making; and the Act establishes further Codes to be ‘regarded by’ various categories of people, but not by normal family carers, who must obey the Act, but are not required to ‘have regard to’ the Code.