COVID-19 resources on Infection control

Results 441 - 450 of 664

Order by    Date Title

Recommendations for safe visiting in care homes during the Covid-19 pandemic

Dementia UK

This flowchart describes the steps residential care providers need to take to ensure safe visiting during the pandemic.

Last updated on hub: 08 October 2020

Adult social care: Covid-19: winter plan 2020-2021 newsletter

39 Essex Chambers

This note provides an overview of the Department of Health and Social Care (non-statutory) guidance ‘Adult social care: our COVID-19 winter plan 2020 to 2021’. It discusses the key issues for local authorities, and in particular the interplay with the wellbeing principles of the Care Act 2014, including managing a potential conflict in terms of the wellbeing of both care home residents and those in the community with care and support needs as regards prevention of C-19. It also looks at the implications of the winter plan for the right to respect for family and private life, addressing the tension between the imperative to protect the health of social care users (and the social care workforce) and the need to respect the family life and private life rights of those who might be subject to protective restrictions. Finally, it explores the impact of the winter plan on deprivation of liberty safeguards, in particular in relation to testing and 14-day isolation requirements.

Last updated on hub: 06 October 2020

Coronavirus (Covid-19): changes to the Care Act 2014

39 Essex Chambers

Discusses the Care Act easements, provided for under the Coronavirus Act 2020. This briefing examines the guidance for local authorities on when it is appropriate to use the Care Act easements, emphasises the information that should be given to those being assessed and debates what changes to safeguarding policies may occur during the relaxation period. It also analyses the relationship between the Care Act easements guidance and the hospital discharge service requirements.

Last updated on hub: 06 October 2020

The impact of COVID-19 on kinship care: evidence from the kinship care charity Grandparents Plus

Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care

The challenges faced by children in kinship care and their families have been regularly identified in research. Kinship carers look after for some of society’s most vulnerable children, usually whilst facing many adversities themselves. The COVID-19 global pandemic had a significant impact on kinship carers, placing additional stress on their already difficult situations. This article describes the work of Grandparents Plus, the leading charity for kinship care in England and Wales, to identify the impact of COVID-19 on kinship carers and ensure they continued to receive support. Data were gathered using three surveys of kinship carers in England and Wales, and through discussions with Grandparents Plus project workers and volunteers. Kinship carers reported feeling scared about catching the virus, and what would happen to the children if they fell seriously ill. They were exhausted caring for the children twenty-four hours a day without a break and they were worried about the uncertainties of living with a ‘new normal’. Grandparents Plus used this information to develop new and existing support services to meet kinship carers’ needs in the context of COVID-19. It is concluded that kinship carers need sustained support to develop resilience to protect against future unforeseen crises.

Last updated on hub: 06 October 2020

COVID-19 policy tracker: a timeline of national policy and health system responses to COVID-19 in England

The Health Foundation

This policy tracker documents national government and health and social care system responses to COVID-19 in England, and how they change over time. The full tracker includes data on what changes have been introduced, when, why, and by whom – as well as how these changes have been communicated by policymakers. Policy changes are tracked with respect to five areas – from health and care system changes to policy narrative, measures to limit spread, research and development and wider social and economic policy. The tracker is updated regularly and was last updated on 28 September 2020.

Last updated on hub: 06 October 2020

Long-stay mental health care institutions and the COVID-19 crisis: identifying and addressing the challenges for better response and preparedness

World Health Organization

This report presents the results of a survey with 169 long-stay institutions to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on services, staff, service users and residents with psychosocial and intellectual disabilities. Specific themes explored in this report are how well the institutions were prepared for the crisis by authorities, the quality of communications, the availability of personal protective equipment, and the impact of the risk of infection and protective measures on staff and residents. The report finds that there were significant differences between the types of institution reporting, which included psychiatric hospitals; care homes; and other settings for mental health care. Responses from psychiatric, intellectual disability and autism services were broadly consistent with those from social care homes, except for the following significant areas of difference: social care homes were happier with information from the authorities and the information they provided for residents in accessible formats; care home staff reported challenges with more workload, stress, frustration and burnout; care homes were less likely to use discharge to reduce numbers and manage the virus; and more likely to report an increase in the use of restrictive measures. The analysis highlights the need to put in place comprehensive and practical plans to facilitate management and day-to-day operations under crisis conditions. The keys to this are: having clear guidelines and tested systems in place; ensuring clarity of communication; implementing a comprehensive and facility-based infection prevention and control plan; establishing clear procedures and protocols to ensure safe environments; being able to increase staff capacities according to need; and having a clear focus on ensuring person-centred and human rights-based care in all decision-making.

Last updated on hub: 05 October 2020

Delivering core NHS and care services during the pandemic and beyond: second report of session 2019–21

UK Parliament

Findings of an inquiry to investigate a range of issues relating to the delivery of core NHS and care services during the pandemic. This report addresses the following issues: communication with patients; managing waiting times and the backlog of appointments; issues facing NHS and care staff relating to access to personal protective equipment (PPE) and routine testing of staff; issues facing NHS and care staff relating to workforce “burnout”; and what lessons can be learnt from the pandemic in order to support the NHS in the future. The coronavirus pandemic posed an unprecedented challenge to the NHS and social care system. The report raises concerns about the lack of effective communication strategies with patients; the substantial increase in the number of missed, delayed and cancelled appointments across critical non-COVID services; and the effect of the pandemic on the physical and mental wellbeing of the NHS and social care workforce. The report also assesses what changes should take place to support the NHS in the long-term. They include introducing an expanded 111 dial service to support A&E departments, investigating how technology (“telemedicine”) can be used without digitally excluding those already disadvantaged, and retaining capacity and resources from the independent sector in the long term.

Last updated on hub: 05 October 2020

As if expendable: the UK government’s failure to protect older people in care homes during the Covid-19 pandemic

Amnesty International UK

This report examines the impact of decisions, policies, and decision-making processes at the national and local level on the human rights of older people in care homes in England in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is based on interviews with 18 relatives of older people who either died in care homes or are currently living in care homes in different parts of England; nine owners, managers and staff of care homes in different parts of the country; eight staff and volunteers working in non-profit organisations advocating on behalf of care home residents and staff; three members of parliament and local authorities, and four legal and medical professionals. Among the government’ failures, the report highlights discharge of patients from hospitals into care homes; denial of access to hospitals and other medical services; misuse of ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ (DNAR) forms; inadequate access to testing; insufficient PPE and poor PPE guidance; poor, late and contradictory guidance; and failure to respond to gaps in staffing. The report also discusses the suspension of visits and failure of oversight, including the failure to wear PPE, challenges of remote communications and the devastating impact of prolonged isolation. The report argues that the UK government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic violated the human rights of older people in care homes in England and that remedial action must be taken without delay to ensure that mistakes are not repeated. It calls for a full independent public inquiry to consider the overall pandemic preparations and response in adult social care and care homes, including a full investigation into actions taken to ensure a comprehensive and timely cross-government response for social care and a review of the adequacy of the funding made available to support adult social care services and care homes in responding to the pandemic.

Last updated on hub: 05 October 2020

Crises collide: women and Covid-19: examining gender and other equality issues during the Coronavirus outbreak

Women’s Budget Group

This report outlines issues relating to women and Covid-19 in the UK and makes recommendations for gender-sensitive improvements to the UK Government’s response. It focuses on the implications of the pandemic for women in relation to public health, social care, economic inequalities, social security, housing, violence against women and girls, the justice system and human rights. 73% of Covid-19 critical care cases in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are men. However, growing evidence shows that due to pre-existing gender and other inequalities, different groups of women in the UK will experience Covid-19 in specific ways in the short, medium and long term. The report finds that women are the majority of health and care workers and are the majority of workers with highest exposure to Covid-19; young women are disproportionately likely to work in the sectors that have been hit hardest by the lock-down; women are more likely to be low paid and in insecure employment and are the majority of people living in poverty and female-headed households are more likely to be poor; pre Covid-19, women were more likely to struggle with debt and bills; on average, women carry out 60% more unpaid work than men; women are more likely to experience domestic and sexual violence and abuse and are the majority (67%) of people living in homelessness.

Last updated on hub: 01 October 2020

Delivering care at home and housing support services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Care Inspectorate inquiry into decision making and partnership working

Care Inspectorate Scotland

This report draws together the views of health and social care partnerships and service providers in Scotland about their experience of care at home and housing support services during the first phase of this pandemic. It sets out the findings of a Care Inspectorate’s inquiry which investigated how these services were prioritised to help ensure service delivery continuity; what were the known impacts on people who experience care; how the risks to service delivery were mitigated; how effective were the partnership working arrangements; and what were the recovery plans for services. The inquiry found that the most robust responses to the challenges and uncertainties of the pandemic involved an integrated approach and included: targeting resources to meet gaps and pressures as they occurred and reviewing and refining approaches as new information came to light; maintaining a focus on how staff remained confident, safe and secure by addressing the challenges of PPE, guidance and testing; responding quickly with additional financial support and guarantees to ensure services remained viable and that the commitment was not undermined by unpredictable reductions in income and additional costs; investing in staff terms and conditions to reduce disincentives to testing and self-isolating when required; and working together across health and social care, service providers and the community.

Last updated on hub: 30 September 2020

Order by    Date Title