A commissioner’s guide to developing and sustaining local user-led organisations
What do I do next? Scenario 4: There are two or more well established, well networked ULOs
Governance
Meets all ULO design criteria? | Typically all |
Governance arrangements in place? | Yes |
Management committee? | Yes – effective committee, typically engaged in effective partnership arrangements |
Funding and business-readiness
Established for how long? | Typically 3 years or more |
Permanent staff? | Yes, including management |
Infrastructure in place (e.g. IT, HR, finance, own premises)? | Yes – these may be shared |
Business plan in place? | Yes |
Funding arrangements? | Core grant from commissioner; Funding from external funders; One or more contracts; Self-generated income |
Provides more than one service? | Usually |
Provides services in more than one area? | Usually |
Funding and business-readiness
Covers all impairment groups? | Typically yes |
Members? | Yes, and membership can be large |
Effective mechanisms for engaging service users? | Yes – the approach will typically be joined up |
Networking? | Has good relationships with other ULOs, BME/LGBT/carers/older people/civil society organisations or wider than social care. This is the key factor in Scenario 4 |

Essential actions to move to next stop on the 'ULO journey'
- facilitate networking between existing ULOs, including any newly emerging ULOs
- request established ULOs provide mentoring support to emerging and embryonic ULOs
- encourage joint working across social care and health
- share contact details of the ULOs widely
- consider releasing local authority staff (who have a strong understanding of the unique value of ULOs) on secondment, and employing service users in ULOs on local authority contracts