Report 37: Personalisation, productivity and efficiency

References

1. DH (2010a) Think local, act personal: Next steps for transforming adult social care, London: DH.
2. DH (2010b) A vision for adult social care: Capable communities and active citizens, London: DH.
3. Tyson, A. (2009) Self-directed support in Hartlepool 2006-–2009, Wythall: In Control.
4. ADASS (Association of Directors of Adult Social Services) and Local Government Association (2009) Putting People First: Measuring progress, London: ADASS and LGA.
5. CSED (2009) Assessment and care management: Process improvement, London: CSED.
6. Rowlett, N. and Deighton, S. (2009) 'Simplifying direct payments: how Lincolnshire County Council utilised risk management to deliver genuine improvement', Journal of Care Services Management, vol 3, no 2, pp 131–43.
7. Stainton, T., Boyce, S. and Phillips, C. (2009) 'Independence pays: a cost and resource analysis of direct payments in two local authorities', Disability and Society, vol 24, no 2, pp 161–72.
8. NAAPS (National Association of Adult Placement Services) (2009) Supporting micromarket development: Key messages for local authorities, London: Department of Health.
9. Dayson, C. (2010) Understanding personalisation: Implications for third sector infrastructure and their work with organisations on the frontline, Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.
10. DH (2010c) Practical approaches to market and provider development, London: DH.
11. VODG (Voluntary Organisations Disability Group) and IPC (Institute of Public Care) (2010) Gain without pain, Oxford: Institute of Public Care.
12. IPC (Institute of Public Care) (2010) National Market Development Forum: What are the implications of personalisation for social care tendering?, Oxford: IPC.
13. Audit Commission (2006) Choosing well: Analysing the costs and benefits of choice in local public services, London: Audit Commission.
14. Audit Commission (2010) Financial management aspects of personal budgets, London: Audit Commission.
15. CSED (2008) Electronic monitoring and scheduling of home care, London: Department of Health.
16. CBI (Confederation of British Industry) and LGA (Local Government Association) (2009) Commissioning strategically for better public services across local government, London: CBI and LGA.
17. Jones, K. and Netten, A. (2010) 'The costs of change: a case study of the process of implementing individual budgets across pilot local authorities in England', Health and Social Care in the Community, vol 18, no 1, pp 51–8.
18. OPM (Office for Public Management) (2010) Delivering personal budgets for adult social care: Reflections from Essex, London: OPM.
19. CSED (2007) Better brokerage, London: CSED.
20. Boyle, D. and Harris, M. (2010) The challenge of co-production, London: NESTA
21. Raynes, N., Clark, H. and Beecham, J. (2006) The report of the Older People's Inquiry into 'That little bit of help', York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
22. PSSRU (Personal Social Services Research Unit) (2008) The National Evaluation of Partnerships for Older People Projects (POPPs), Kent: PSSRU, University of Kent.
23. DH (2009) Use of resources in adult social care: A guide for local authorities, London: DH.
24. Spandler, H. and Vick, N. (2006) 'Opportunities for independent living using direct payments in mental health', Health and Social Care in the Community, vol 14, no 2, pp 107–15.
25. Glendinning, C., Challis, D., Fernandez, J., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Manthorpe, J., Moran, N., Netten, A., Stevens, M. and Wilberforce, M. (2008) Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme: Final report, York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
26. Audit Commission (2009) Means to an end: Joint financing across health and social care, London: Audit Commission.
27. Carr, S. and Robbins, D. (2009) SCIE Research Briefing 20: The implementation of individual budget schemes in adult social care, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
28. Heywood, F. and Turner, L. (2007) Better outcomes, lower costs – Implications for health and social care budgets of investment in housing adaptations, improvements and equipment: A review of the evidence, London: Office for Disability Issues.
29. Beech, R. and Roberts, D. (2008) SCIE Research briefing 28: Assistive technology and older people, London: SCIE
30. Glendinning, C., Clarke, S., Hare, P., Kotchetkova, I., Maddison, J. And Newbronner, L. (2007) SCIE Knowledge review 13: Outcomes-focused services for older people, London: SCIE
31. CSED (2009) Implementing telecare to achieve efficiencies, London: CSED.
32. CSED and SPRU (Social Policy Research Unit) (2009) Prospective longitudinal study interim report – 1 of 2: The short-term outcomes and costs of reablement services, London: Department of Health.
33. Glasby, J., Ham, C., Littlechild, R. and McKay, S. (2010) The case for social care reform – The wider economic and social benefits: Final report, Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
34. Davey, V., Fernandez, J., Knapp, M., Vick, N., Jolly, D., Swift, P. et al (2007) Direct payments: A national survey of direct payments policy and practice, London: Personal Social Services Research Unit/London School of Economics and Political Science.
35. Priestley, M., Jolly, D., Pearson, C., Riddell, S., Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (2007) 'Direct payments and disabled people in the UK: supply, demand and devolution', British Journal of Social Work, vol 37, no 7, pp 1189–204.
36. Fox, A. (2010) Thoughts on Putting People First: Next steps, Liverpool: National Association of Adult Placement Services.
37. ADASS and LGA (2010) Personal budgets – Checking the results, London: ADASS and LGA.