Key Care Act principles for assessment and determination of eligibility
The Care Act 2014 sets out local authorities’ duties when assessing people’s care and support needs.
This resource supports care practitioners and answers their questions about assessment and determination of eligibility under the Care Act. It also provides practical guidance over what they should do when applying the letter and spirit of this law.
For brevity and simplicity, throughout this resource the term ‘assessment under the Care Act’ is used to refer to either a Care Act assessment of:
- an individual’s needs for care and support
- a carer’s needs for support.
Which Care Act principles apply to the assessment under the Care Act and determination of eligibility?
Woven through the tapestry of the Care Act, there are eight fundamental principles, which you as a social care practitioner should be able to see in your practice when undertaking an assessment and determining eligibility.
- Strengths-based approach
- Transparency
- Whole family/holistic
- Maximise person’s involvement
- Recognise fluctuating needs
- Promote individual choice and control
- Appropriateness
- Proportionality.
Adhering to these principles will enable you to ensure that your practice is person-centred and working towards the key legal duty of promoting individual wellbeing. See below for further information that will help you incorporate these principles into your practice.
- understand the questions they are being asked
- are capable of providing answers to the questions
- understand the implications on their personal circumstances of the overall process
- have the capacity to express their wishes and feelings.
- Person-centred and suitable for the individual’s capacity, capabilities, circumstances and communication preferences.
- Carried out over an appropriate and reasonable timescale, taking into account the urgency of needs and with consideration of any fluctuation of those needs.
- Proportionate to the extent and severity of the person’s needs, which will have been identified at the stage of initial information gathering and subsequent contact; proportionality is related to the depth of the information gathered, not to the breadth of it, so you should not assume that certain areas or topics are not relevant to an individual. Your assessment style should therefore not be one size fits all, but adapted to the individual’s circumstances, needs (communication needs, levels of complexity etc) and preferences, and underpinned by the eight principles of the Care Act.
- person-centred
- strengths-based
- collaborative
- clear and transparent
- flexible
- Ensure the assessment is only as intrusive as it needs to be to establish an accurate picture of the person’s needs, personal wishes and preferences, desired outcomes and the severity and overall extent of their needs.
- Work with partners (e.g. housing, the voluntary sector, adult mental health professionals, relevant professionals in the criminal justice system) to join up around the individual and avoid multiple assessments taking place at different times.
- Use a format of assessment proportionate to the level of presenting needs, for example a telephone assessment may be the best approach in some cases.
- Actively listen to the individual to understand the initial presenting needs and explore as necessary to ensure any underlying needs are also explored and understood.
- Support the individual to explore all nine areas of wellbeing if they have not identified them initially, but accept there are some they may not wish to discuss.
- Recognise and seek to draw out the individual’s own knowledge, strengths and capacities in line with strength-based practice.
- How do their needs present themselves on the given day?
- If their needs change over time, are those presenting during the conversation a true reflection of their condition over time?
- Do they have good days and bad days, what is the frequency and degree of variation and what may contribute towards it?
- How much of an issue have the fluctuations been in the past, and in what way?
- How are their needs likely to develop in the future? Are the fluctuations likely to persist?
- How might the fluctuations impact on the outcomes they want to achieve in their life, and in what ways?
- the probability that an event will occur with beneficial or harmful outcomes for an individual or others with whom they come into contact. For example, an individual you are assessing may express a desire to live independently of the family home. While there may be harmful outcomes initially, with a period of enablement support, the individual may be able to develop independent living skills and so the initial risk will have beneficial outcomes. When making a determination of eligibility you will need to consider risks which may apply in the event that the individual is not supported to achieve the specified outcome.
- A product of the likelihood that an event will happen and the impact that event will have if it does occur.
“Let’s look first at what people can do with their skills and their resources and what can the people around do in their relationships and communities. People need to be seen as more than just their care needs.” Alex Fox, Chief Executive of Shared Lives Plus, Vice Chair of Think Local Act Personal and a SCIE trustee
To take a strengths-based approach to assessment, you as a social care practitioner should see your role in the assessment process as a facilitator of change, working to develop a high-quality relationship between you and the individual which you are supporting to identify needs, personal outcomes and maintaining or improving wellbeing. You will get to know the individual, not just their needs. You will need to work in collaboration with the individual, supporting them to do things for themselves, with the aim that they become more than passive recipients of care and support. In order to do this, it is fundamental that you establish and acknowledge the capacity, skills, knowledge, network and potential of both the individual and the local community. In taking a strengths-based approach to assessment, it may be possible for you to collectively identify what opportunities already exist which the individual can access independently thus increasing independence and developing personal resilience. Your practice should not be one size fits all but the format, methods and approaches to the relationship should be led by the individual, or their representative, to promote them as experts in their own life. Begin with the assumption that they know what is best for their wellbeing. A strengths-based assessment will include the individual’s:
- personal resources, abilities, skills, knowledge, potential etc.
- network and its resources, abilities, skills etc.
- community resources, also known as ‘social capital’ and/or ‘universal resources’.
- allow for a break in the assessment if needed so that the person doesn’t become overwhelmed
- demonstrate an understanding of the person’s condition
- repeat facts, to confirm they are accurate and that you have noted them down correctly.
- Make sure you listen.
- Let people speak, even if their assessment is taking place with an advocate present.
- Be clear that you can’t fix everything in one session and that this is an ongoing process.
- Build trust with people.
- Be conversational, without too much direct questioning – people will open up more and provide more detailed answers.
- Be friendly but be aware of the difference between ‘friend’ and ‘friendly’.
- Be clear about who is making any given decision. If you need to take your findings to your manager, then be clear about this from the start.
- Let the individual know that they have a right to appeal against the outcome of the assessment.
- Explain the possible outcomes.
- Don’t use jargon.
- Perform your assessment as an intervention, so that the individual will benefit from the process itself no matter what the outcome is.
As a social care practitioner, when you are undertaking an assessment or determining their eligibility, you will ‘look at the person’s life holistically, considering their needs and agreed outcomes in the context of their skills, ambitions and priorities’. This means that you will see more than the difficulties that they are facing, and offer the opportunity to have a conversation about their whole life and not just their assessed needs. You need to look at the individual as a person and their relationships, interactions and role in them and in their community.
You will see the individual as a whole person and consider all of their needs as appropriate and proportionate, in line with the nine areas of wellbeing. For example, having a conversation about important relationships, hobbies, previous life experiences. These things may seem small to you but mean the world to the individual, and could support you and the individual to identify assets and strengths which could be utilised in supporting them to achieve the outcomes that matter to them without the necessity for state intervention.
The Care Act recognises that an individual’s needs do not just impact on them but can also on other people in their lives. When having an assessment conversation with an individual, it will be important for you to give them the opportunity to explore this and to consider your duties in relation to carers assessments.
You will consider the individual in the context of their whole community, in terms of their desire to contribute to it and hence be better integrated in the wider society around them. The community the individual has access to should also be considered as a potential network of support, that could enable the individual to achieve their desired outcomes and prevent needs from escalating.