An effectiveness evaluation of a place-based integrated care intervention combining social prescribing and general practice to improve health outcomes in a highly deprived and ethnically diverse area of central Bradford.
Key statistics
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This evaluation contributes to neighbourhood health and care evidence by examining a real-world integrated service that deliberately combines clinical primary care with community-oriented support through social prescribing. It aligns with place-based approaches that seek to address both medical and social determinants of health in deprived urban settings.
The finding that CLICS may reduce unplanned hospital admissions is promising, particularly in the context of cities with high baseline rates of acute service use. However, the differences observed by ethnic group raise important equity questions about why benefits appear stronger for some populations than for others. This reflects broader concerns in neighbourhood health that services must not only be integrated but also culturally accessible and inclusive.
Improvements in wellbeing and health-related quality of life suggest that integrating social prescribing and primary care has potential benefits beyond service utilisation. These outcomes are particularly relevant for place-based strategies that aim to support resilience, self-management and connection to community resources.
However, the evaluation’s limitations (particularly its observational design and short follow-up) mean that evidence of effectiveness remains tentative. For policymakers and local teams investing in integrated neighbourhood services, this highlights the importance of building evaluation into programme design and ensuring that data collection supports equity-focused analyses.
An analysis of integrated care system plans examining how they address health inequalities and the strategies proposed to improve equity.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This paper highlights the ambition within integrated care systems to address health inequalities through place-based and integrated approaches. The neighbourhood focus and emphasis on cross-sector collaboration provide a foundation for tackling not only access to services, but also the wider social determinants that shape health outcomes.
However, the analysis reveals uneven commitment and capacity across systems. While some integrated care systems articulate clear intentions around equity, others lack detailed strategies or measurable goals. From a care equity perspective, this variability risks reinforcing geographic disparities rather than reducing them.
The findings also suggest that collaboration with non-health partners is inconsistent. Where partnerships are underdeveloped, opportunities to influence housing, employment and community infrastructure may be missed, limiting the potential impact of neighbourhood health and care.
Importantly, the paper raises questions about whether equity is driving system design or being addressed retrospectively. Without embedding equity as a core organising principle, integrated care systems may struggle to translate place-based working into meaningful reductions in inequality.
Overall, the study indicates that neighbourhood health and care has significant potential to support equity, but this depends on the depth of strategic commitment, clarity of measurement and the strength of cross-sector partnerships within integrated care systems.
Investigating how policy changes affect end-of-life care in certain areas
Key statistics
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This realist evaluation explores how national end of life care policy in England shapes the experiences of older people nearing death. The study highlights the complexity of translating national policy into consistent local practice.
Patient experience at the end of life is shaped by a combination of formal services and informal care. Interviews with patients and families emphasised the importance of compassion, dignity and social connection during the final stages of life. Many patients expressed a preference to remain in familiar environments such as their home or care home rather than being admitted to hospital.
However, the study found that achieving these preferences often depends on the availability of community-based services. Shortages of community nursing, limited overnight palliative care support and inconsistent access to home visits from clinicians were identified as barriers to delivering care outside hospital settings.
Variation in service provision between local areas was a recurring theme. Differences in commissioning decisions, local budgets and organisational structures meant that some areas offered more comprehensive services than others. For example, variation in spending on end of life care between clinical commissioning groups suggests that resource allocation may influence the quality and availability of services.
The research also highlights the fragmented relationship between health and social care systems. Medical care, such as pain management, is typically funded through the NHS, while practical and relational support such as personal care is often provided through social care services. Because these services operate under different budgets and governance structures, patients may experience gaps in support.
The study emphasises that policy alone cannot guarantee equitable care. Successful implementation requires alignment between national policy goals, local commissioning decisions and the priorities of professionals, patients and families.
From a health and social care equity perspective, the findings illustrate how geographical variation in services contributes to unequal care experiences at the end of life. Addressing these disparities will require stronger integration between health and social care systems, better support for the social care workforce and clearer mechanisms to reduce local variation in service provision.
A report examining how Primary Care Networks can address health inequalities through place-based working, with a focus on learning from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This report highlights the role of PCNs in advancing neighbourhood health and care through place-based working. During the COVID-19 pandemic, PCNs were often at the centre of local responses, coordinating with councils, voluntary organisations and community groups to reach vulnerable populations.
From a care equity perspective, the report shows how local knowledge and relationships enabled targeted responses to inequalities that were not easily addressed through national approaches alone. Flexible delivery models and partnership working helped PCNs adapt services to local need.
The pandemic context also revealed structural challenges. Variability in capacity, data access and partnership maturity affected how effectively PCNs could respond, raising questions about consistency and sustainability beyond emergency conditions.
Overall, the report suggests that PCNs can play a key role in neighbourhood health and care, but their ability to address inequalities depends on strong place-based partnerships, access to data and ongoing system support. Embedding these lessons into routine practice is central to reducing health inequalities over time.
A national review assessing progress in reducing health inequalities in England ten years after Fair Society, Healthy Lives.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This review provides a critical backdrop for neighbourhood health and care policy. By showing that health inequalities have worsened over the decade following the original Marmot Review, it stresses the limitations of approaches that focus narrowly on healthcare delivery alone.
The findings reinforce the importance of place-based action. Neighbourhoods shape exposure to poverty, housing quality, employment opportunities and social connection, all of which influence health outcomes. From a care equity perspective, neighbourhood health and care offers a potential mechanism for acting on these determinants locally.
However, the review also highlights that local action cannot substitute for national policy. Without sufficient investment and cross-government commitment, neighbourhood initiatives risk operating in contexts where inequalities continue to deepen.
Overall, The Marmot Review 10 Years On strengthens the case for neighbourhood health and care that is explicitly equity-focused, prevention-oriented and connected to wider social and economic policy. Without this alignment, neighbourhood approaches are unlikely to reverse entrenched health inequalities.
A case study describing an integrated neighbourhood approach to improving health outcomes in Fleetwood, a deprived seaside community in Lancashire.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This case study shows how neighbourhood health and care approaches can be applied in a deprived coastal community. Fleetwood faces distinct challenges linked to deprivation, access to services and wider social determinants of health, making it a relevant setting for place-based integration.
By bringing together health, social care and community partners, the initiative seeks to coordinate support around local priorities. From a care equity perspective, this collaborative approach has the potential to improve access and responsiveness for populations that experience poorer health outcomes.
The focus on local context is particularly important. Seaside and coastal communities often face structural disadvantages that are not fully addressed through standard service models. Neighbourhood approaches allow services to be shaped around these specific circumstances.
However, the evidence presented is primarily descriptive. While the case study offers useful insights into partnership working and local delivery, further evaluation would be needed to understand its impact on health outcomes and inequalities over time.
