The impact of digitalisation of GP services on minoritised ethnic communities

Explores the impact of digitalisation on access to and use of primary care services among minoritised ethnic communities.

Key Messages 

  • Language and cultural barriers: Many GP staff lack training and resources in cultural competency, and individuals from ethnic minority communities often rely on informal interpreters, limiting privacy during consultations. 
  • Digital exclusion: People from low-income and ethnic minority backgrounds face challenges accessing and using digital health tools due to limited internet access, device storage, and digital skills.  
  • Carer burden: Female carers in multi-generational households struggle with managing multiple GP app accounts, leading to delays in accessing healthcare services. 
  • Racial stereotypes and digital barriers: Over-reliance on technology and racial bias in assessing symptoms through skin colour can lead to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment for people with darker skin. Sending photos for appointments may not be effective for all skin tones. 

Commentary 

This study highlights how many GPs are directing patients, who already face digital barriers, to use online platforms to access services. These include booking appointments, ordering repeat prescriptions, and receiving test results. Some participants in this study were living in temporary housing, sharing that they often lack access to long term broadband which makes digital engagement even more difficult especially when telephone access is no longer an option. Additionally, GP apps tend to default to English with limited language options, which creates further barriers for migrants. 

Concerns around digital privacy and data security also emerged, in this study, with participants expressing unease about how their information is stored and shared. The findings revealed here highlight deep digital and structural barriers in healthcare, especially for marginalised groups. There is an urgent need for inclusive digital design, language support, staff training in cultural competency, and alternative access routes to ensure fair and equitable healthcare. 

The impact of digitalisation on mental health care

The effects of digital solutions in mental health support

Key Messages 

  • Between 38% to 78% of people with severe mental health conditions seek information on mental health online 
  • Coproduction is necessary: For design purposes, co-production involving clinicians, frontline staff, and people with lived experience is crucial for creating effective and accessible digital mental health tools. Engaging people early in the design process ensures tools reflect real needs and improve outcomes. 
  • Ethical considerations include ensuring ongoing feedback, attention to data governance, and avoiding passive, expert-led models especially when using AI and wearable devices.  
  • Barriers to adopting digital solutions 
  • Staff concerns include lack of training, digital literacy, internet access, and fears that digital tools may weaken therapeutic relationships or lead to disengagement due to reduced face-to-face contact. 
  • There are also concerns about how data from digital platforms might be used, fearing breaches of confidentiality or misuse. 
  • Mixed perceptions of value: While some see digital platforms as a helpful bridge for re-engaging users, others worry they may encourage avoidance or be used as a cost-cutting substitute for proper care. Addressing these attitudes is key to successful implementation. 

Commentary 

  • This paper highlights how digital technologies are reshaping mental health care, offering new possibilities for self-monitoring, remote support, and scalable interventions. It emphasises both the promise and the challenges of digital health innovations (DHIs), noting that while access to smartphones and the internet is growing, barriers such as digital literacy, staff training, and concerns about data privacy persist. The authors give emphasis to the importance of co-production to ensure relevance trust and usability of digital solutions. 
  • This paper is also useful in cautioning against the over reliance of technology as a cost-cutting substitute to face to face support for mental health. The authors call for iterative and inclusive approaches to development of digital tools in a way that is underpinned by accessibility and user testing and feedback to ensure that digital mental health care is effective and equitable, whilst being receptive to the needs of diverse populations.