Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This study explores systemic safety inequities experienced by people with learning disabilities when interacting with health and social care services. Rather than focusing solely on mortality data or adverse events, the research examines lived experiences of care to identify structural factors that contribute to unsafe or inequitable care. 

The analysis identified three overarching themes: health and care system rigidity, systemic gaps and traps within services, and the reliance on ‘dependency work’ undertaken by families, carers and advocates. These findings suggest that inequities are often produced by structural features of health and social care systems rather than by individual-level factors. 

System rigidity was a key issue. Health and social care services often required people with learning disabilities to adapt to standardised systems rather than adapting care to individual needs. Participants reported difficulties with communication, inaccessible information, insufficient time during appointments and environments that could be overwhelming or distressing. These barriers increased risks to patient safety and reduced the ability of individuals to participate fully in their care. 

The study also highlighted systemic gaps within services. Participants described inconsistencies in support provision, limited staffing capacity, poor coordination between services and failures in information sharing across organisations. These issues often led to fragmented care and repeated retelling of medical histories, which created additional burdens for individuals and families. 

A particularly important finding concerns the role of family members, carers and advocates in compensating for systemic weaknesses. Family members, carers and advocates frequently acted as informal safeguards by interpreting information, advocating for reasonable adjustments and ensuring that care needs were understood. While this support was valued, the study emphasises that reliance on social capital can create additional inequities for individuals without strong support networks. 

In terms of care equity, the study shows how structural barriers within service design, staffing and coordination contribute to poorer safety outcomes for people with learning disabilities. Addressing these inequities therefore requires system-level change rather than relying solely on individual staff training or local adjustments. 

Overall, the findings suggest that improving safety for people with learning disabilities requires more flexible service design, better communication practices, stronger advocacy support and improved integration across health and social care services. These changes would help reduce systemic safety inequities and improve care experiences for this population.

This paper uses the term inequalities. In this Evidence Hub, inequities is used where differences in access or outcomes reflect avoidable and unfair structural barriers in health and social care. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This systematic review examines interventions designed to reduce inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care. The review highlights that people living with dementia and their carers often face barriers when trying to access services, which can lead to avoidable differences in health outcomes. 

Many of these barriers occur at several levels. Some relate to individual circumstances such as language, cultural background or socioeconomic status. Others occur at community level, for example where stigma around dementia discourages people from seeking help. Structural barriers within health and social care systems also play an important role, particularly where services are fragmented or poorly coordinated. 

The review finds that system-level solutions appear to have the strongest evidence. These include models such as dementia link workers, integrated care networks and memory clinic collaborations. These approaches can improve coordination between services and help individuals and carers access appropriate support more easily. In some studies, link worker roles also improved quality of life for people living with dementia and reduced pressure on carers. 

Community-level initiatives can also play an important role. Programmes that raise awareness about dementia, reduce stigma and build dementia-friendly communities may encourage earlier help-seeking and improve understanding of the condition. Culturally tailored information and support programmes can also help address barriers faced by minority ethnic communities. 

The review also identifies increasing use of digital tools to support dementia care. Online information platforms, telehealth services and digital care planning tools can help some people access support more easily. However, the authors note that digital solutions can also create new barriers where people lack digital skills, access to technology or reliable internet connections. 

From a health and social care equity perspective, the findings show that inequities in dementia care often arise from structural barriers within systems rather than individual choices. Access to diagnosis, information and support can vary depending on geography, service availability and socioeconomic circumstances.

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications  

Commentary 

This study examines how newly qualified social workers experience and respond to racism in practice during the early stages of their careers. Through focus groups with 67 practitioners, the authors identify significant gaps in training and organisational support for addressing racism within social work and related health and social care contexts. 

Participants widely recognised that racism exists within social work systems, including in interactions between professionals, in organisational decision-making and in experiences from people who draw on care and support. However, many reported feeling unprepared to challenge racism due to limited training during their degree programmes and early employment support programmes such as the Assessed and Supported Year in Employment. 

The research highlights structural barriers within organisations that limit practitioners’ ability to challenge racism. These include fear of professional consequences, lack of managerial support and workplace cultures where discussions about race are avoided. Some participants reported witnessing discriminatory treatment of people who draw on care and support or colleagues but feeling unable to intervene effectively due to uncertainty about organisational procedures or fear of repercussions. 

For practitioners from minoritised ethnic backgrounds, racism directed at them personally was a common concern. Several participants reported that cases were sometimes reassigned when people who draw on care and support refused to work with a Black or Asian social worker, without the behaviour being challenged. This approach prioritised service delivery but left practitioners feeling unsupported and exposed to further discriminatory behaviour. 

The authors also describe a “layering” of barriers across the professional pathway. As illustrated in the framework presented in the paper, obstacles can emerge from multiple sources, including limited exposure to diversity during upbringing, training programmes that lack focus on race, placements with limited diversity, and organisational cultures that discourage discussion of racism. These combined factors reduce practitioners’ confidence and capability to address racism in practice. 

From a health and social care equity perspective, the findings suggest that failure to address racism within professional training and organisational structures may affect both the wellbeing of practitioners and the quality of services delivered to racialised communities. Strengthening anti-racist education, improving organisational accountability and supporting practitioners to challenge discrimination are therefore important steps toward more equitable health and social care practice. 

This study uses the term inequalities. In this Evidence Hub, inequities is used where differences in access or outcomes reflect avoidable and unfair structural barriers in health and social care. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This study explores practical ways to address inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care through a national consultation involving people with dementia, carers, professionals and community organisations. The consultation involved 131 stakeholders who participated in workshops across England to discuss the barriers people face and identify possible solutions. 

The findings show that inequalities in dementia care arise from multiple interacting factors. These include individual circumstances such as income or ethnicity, community-level influences such as stigma or limited social support, and wider structural issues such as service availability and coordination between health and social care systems. 

Many of the proposed solutions focused on improving support after diagnosis. Stakeholders highlighted the potential role of dementia link workers or care navigators who could help people and their families understand their diagnosis, navigate services and access appropriate support. These roles could help address some of the structural barriers that currently create inequities in access to care. 

Community engagement was also identified as important. Participants emphasised the role of dementia-friendly communities, peer networks and local organisations in raising awareness and reducing stigma. Improving understanding of dementia within communities may encourage earlier help-seeking and improve access to support. 

Workforce development was another key theme. Stakeholders identified the need for better training for health and social care professionals, as well as clearer career pathways within the social care workforce. Improving workforce knowledge and stability may help reduce inequities in the quality and availability of dementia services. 

From a care equity perspective, the study highlights that inequalities in dementia care often reflect avoidable structural barriers within systems and services. These inequities can affect who receives a diagnosis, how quickly support is provided and the quality of care available after diagnosis. 

Overall, the study suggests that reducing inequities in dementia care requires coordinated action across multiple levels. Interventions targeting individuals, communities and health and social care systems need to work together to ensure that people living with dementia can access timely diagnosis and appropriate support regardless of their background or location. 

Key messages

Policy implications

Gaps

Commentary
This review provides a system-level view of why digital transformation in health and social care often falls short of its potential. Rather than focusing solely on technology, it highlights the importance of leadership, culture and investment in shaping how digital tools are adopted.

Barriers such as inconsistent strategic direction, digital skills gaps and weak data infrastructure are shown to limit progress. These constraints mean that even well-designed technologies may fail to deliver benefits in practice.

The review also draws attention to the consequences of neglecting inclusion. Without adequate support, digital change can exacerbate existing disparities, particularly for people with limited access, skills or confidence.

Overall, the report reinforces that effective use of technology in care depends on system readiness as much as innovation. Aligning leadership, funding and user-centred design is critical if digital technologies are to improve care without widening inequities.

Key statistics

Key messages

Policy implications

Gaps

Commentary
This report provides an economic assessment of digital inclusion in the UK, focusing on the potential benefits of improving digital skills across the population. The analysis frames digital inclusion as a key component of economic participation, with implications for productivity, employment and the use of public services.

The findings suggest that improving digital skills could also generate savings for the NHS, partly through increased use of online services and reduced demand for in-person appointments. This reflects the growing role of digital channels in accessing health information, services and administrative processes.

From a care equity perspective, the report highlights the risk that digitalisation of services may disadvantage people without access to digital skills, devices or connectivity. Older adults and individuals with lower digital literacy are projected to make up a significant proportion of those who remain digitally excluded in the future. Without targeted support, these groups may face increasing barriers to accessing health and social care services that are delivered or coordinated through digital systems.

Overall, the analysis reinforces the argument that digital inclusion should be treated as a core public infrastructure issue. Investments in digital skills, connectivity and support services may help reduce exclusion from digital health and care services while improving the efficiency of public service delivery.

Key Messages 

Policy implications

Gaps

Commentary 

Key messages

Policy implications

Gaps

Commentary

This review provides a detailed picture of the adult social care workforce in Cornwall, linking workforce conditions to the wider local economy. By bringing together data on pay, turnover, skills and demographics, it highlights the complexity of sustaining care provision in a geographically diverse area. 

The findings show how workforce challenges are unevenly distributed. Differences in demographics, skills and turnover across Cornwall point to the limits of one-size-fits-all approaches to workforce planning and the importance of place-based strategies. 

From a care equity perspective, the review draws attention to who makes up the workforce and how their experiences vary. Gender, age, nationality, ethnicity and disability all shape access to employment, training and progression within adult social care. Where skills gaps or low pay persist, these patterns risk reinforcing inequities within the workforce and, in turn, affecting the quality and continuity of care. 

Overall, the report underlines that workforce strategy is inseparable from equity considerations. Addressing disparities in pay, skills and opportunity is not only central to supporting workers, but also to ensuring that adult social care can meet the needs of communities across Cornwall in a fair and sustainable way. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This study highlights how identity influenced the working lives of minority ethnic dementia care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants’ accounts show how experiences of racism and exclusion sat alongside strong professional commitment and a sense of responsibility to those they supported. 

The findings underline the emotional labour involved in dementia care, particularly under crisis conditions. Where workplace support was limited or inconsistent, feelings of being undervalued were intensified, shaping how workers understood their role and status within care settings. 

From a care equity perspective, the study exposes how structural inequities within the workforce affect both staff wellbeing and the delivery of care. Minority ethnic workers faced additional burdens linked to discrimination and lack of recognition, reflecting wider inequities in the social care sector. These conditions risk reinforcing disparities in retention, progression and workforce stability. 

Overall, the paper demonstrates that equitable dementia care depends on equitable treatment of the workforce. Addressing racism, strengthening support structures and recognising the contributions of minority ethnic care workers are essential steps toward a fairer and more resilient care system. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 
This study highlights the uneven distribution of digital skills within the social care workforce and how this shapes engagement with learning and development. Preferences for face-to-face training suggest that digital learning cannot be assumed to be universally accessible or acceptable. 

The relationship between age, confidence and digital skill points to the need for targeted support rather than uniform approaches. Where workers lack confidence, digital learning tools may become barriers rather than enablers of professional development. 

From a care equity perspective, disparities in digital capability within the workforce risk reinforcing inequities in access to training, progression and job security. Workers with lower digital skills may be excluded from development opportunities as learning increasingly moves online, affecting retention and workforce resilience. 

Overall, the study stresses that digital transformation in care depends on investing in people as much as platforms. Supporting equitable access to skills and training is essential if technology is to strengthen, rather than fragment, the social care workforce. 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This rapid review highlights the range of approaches that have been used to attract and retain social care workers in the UK. Initiatives such as apprenticeships, accelerated learning routes and national campaigns reflect ongoing attempts to stabilise a workforce facing high turnover. 

The findings also show how limited the evidence base remains. While many innovations appear promising, few have been robustly evaluated, making it difficult to assess which approaches genuinely improve retention over time. The predominance of pre-pandemic studies could arguably limit their relevance to current workforce pressures. 

Thinking about equitable social care, the review raises questions about who benefits from workforce innovations. Access to training, apprenticeships and progression opportunities may vary by role, region and personal circumstances, potentially reinforcing existing inequities within the workforce. Where initiatives focus on entry rather than conditions, they may do little to address the factors that drive turnover among lower-paid or marginalised workers. 

Overall, the review suggests that improving workforce sustainability requires more than isolated innovations. Building equitable and effective recruitment and retention strategies depends on better evidence, attention to working conditions and a clearer understanding of how initiatives affect different groups within the social care workforce. 

Key statistics 

Key messages 

Policy implications 

Gaps 

Commentary 

This study provides insight into how younger people experience work in adult social care, highlighting both the appeal of relational care and the challenges of sustaining a career in the sector. Participants valued the sense of purpose and connection that care work offered, but often struggled to see a future within the role. A lack of structured training, limited shadowing and unclear progression routes emerged as key factors undermining retention. These issues were compounded by workload pressures and burnout, leading many younger workers to view social care as a short-term option rather than a viable career. 

For equitable care, the findings raise concerns about who is able to remain in the workforce. When early-career workers leave due to poor support and limited progression, the sector risks becoming less diverse in age and experience. This has implications for workforce sustainability and for people drawing on care, who may experience greater turnover and reduced continuity. 

Overall, the study suggests that improving retention among younger workers requires more than recruitment campaigns. Creating equitable opportunities for training, progression and wellbeing is essential if adult social care is to attract and retain the next generation of workers and provide consistent, high-quality care.