A survey study examining the digital skills, experiences and attitudes of the Northern Ireland social care workforce towards technology for learning and development.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This study highlights the uneven distribution of digital skills within the social care workforce and how this shapes engagement with learning and development. Preferences for face-to-face training suggest that digital learning cannot be assumed to be universally accessible or acceptable.
The relationship between age, confidence and digital skill points to the need for targeted support rather than uniform approaches. Where workers lack confidence, digital learning tools may become barriers rather than enablers of professional development.
From a care equity perspective, disparities in digital capability within the workforce risk reinforcing inequities in access to training, progression and job security. Workers with lower digital skills may be excluded from development opportunities as learning increasingly moves online, affecting retention and workforce resilience.
Overall, the study stresses that digital transformation in care depends on investing in people as much as platforms. Supporting equitable access to skills and training is essential if technology is to strengthen, rather than fragment, the social care workforce.
An evidence review examining innovations to support attraction, recruitment and retention of social care staff in the UK, alongside factors influencing staff turnover.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This rapid review highlights the range of approaches that have been used to attract and retain social care workers in the UK. Initiatives such as apprenticeships, accelerated learning routes and national campaigns reflect ongoing attempts to stabilise a workforce facing high turnover.
The findings also show how limited the evidence base remains. While many innovations appear promising, few have been robustly evaluated, making it difficult to assess which approaches genuinely improve retention over time. The predominance of pre-pandemic studies could arguably limit their relevance to current workforce pressures.
Thinking about equitable social care, the review raises questions about who benefits from workforce innovations. Access to training, apprenticeships and progression opportunities may vary by role, region and personal circumstances, potentially reinforcing existing inequities within the workforce. Where initiatives focus on entry rather than conditions, they may do little to address the factors that drive turnover among lower-paid or marginalised workers.
Overall, the review suggests that improving workforce sustainability requires more than isolated innovations. Building equitable and effective recruitment and retention strategies depends on better evidence, attention to working conditions and a clearer understanding of how initiatives affect different groups within the social care workforce.
A qualitative study exploring why younger people enter adult social care, what they value about the work, and the factors influencing their decisions to stay or leave.
Key statistics
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This study provides insight into how younger people experience work in adult social care, highlighting both the appeal of relational care and the challenges of sustaining a career in the sector. Participants valued the sense of purpose and connection that care work offered, but often struggled to see a future within the role. A lack of structured training, limited shadowing and unclear progression routes emerged as key factors undermining retention. These issues were compounded by workload pressures and burnout, leading many younger workers to view social care as a short-term option rather than a viable career.
For equitable care, the findings raise concerns about who is able to remain in the workforce. When early-career workers leave due to poor support and limited progression, the sector risks becoming less diverse in age and experience. This has implications for workforce sustainability and for people drawing on care, who may experience greater turnover and reduced continuity.
Overall, the study suggests that improving retention among younger workers requires more than recruitment campaigns. Creating equitable opportunities for training, progression and wellbeing is essential if adult social care is to attract and retain the next generation of workers and provide consistent, high-quality care.
A report examining how discrimination and unequal treatment affect staff across health and adult social care, and the impact on care quality, staff wellbeing and service delivery.
Key statistics
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This report looks at workforce inequities across health and adult social care and shows that these are not only staff issues. They also affect how care is delivered. The report was commissioned by CQC and combines survey data, interviews, literature review and case studies to understand what workforce inequities look like, what drives them and what helps reduce them.
A central finding is that race and ethnicity-related inequities were the most commonly reported. Staff also reported inequities linked to sex or gender, disability, mental health conditions and nationality. Many respondents described overlapping forms of discrimination, which matters because people do not experience these issues one at a time in real life.
The report makes clear that workforce inequities are shaped by both workplace culture and wider systems. Staff most often pointed to managers’ attitudes, colleagues’ attitudes and organisational culture as key drivers. That matters for care equity because staff who are excluded, ignored or treated unfairly may be less able to progress, less likely to stay, and less likely to speak up when something is wrong.
The findings also show a clear link between workforce inequities and the quality of care. The report says staff experiencing inequities reported negative effects on service quality, care quality and interactions with people using services. In particular, more than 40% of respondents experiencing or observing race or ethnicity-related inequities reported poor interactions with patients or people using services.
From a care equity perspective, this is important because inequities affecting staff can feed through into inequities affecting people who use services. If some parts of the workforce are more exposed to bullying, poorer progression, low pay or unsafe speaking up cultures, that can affect continuity, trust and service quality. It can also be worse in parts of the system already under pressure, including adult social care, smaller providers and areas facing recruitment and funding problems.
Another useful finding is that the most common EDI activity was not seen as the most effective. Staff training and celebrating diversity were common, but respondents were more likely to value strong complaints systems, transparent data and visible senior leadership action. This suggests that tackling workforce inequities needs practical follow-through, not just awareness activity.
Overall, the report shows that workforce inequities are part of wider structural problems in health and adult social care. Improving care equity means paying attention to how staff are treated, who is heard, who progresses, and who feels safe at work. Without that, inequities in the workforce are likely to continue affecting inequities in care.
A study examining recruitment and retention challenges in adult social care services in England, including workforce mobility, rural employment barriers and the role of commissioning and labour market conditions.
Key statistics
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This study explores the challenges involved in recruiting and retaining staff in adult social care services in England. The social care workforce is large and diverse, yet the sector continues to experience difficulties attracting and retaining staff.
Low pay and demanding working conditions are commonly cited reasons why people leave social care roles. Care providers must also compete with other sectors such as the NHS, hospitality and retail, which may offer higher wages or more stable working hours. These labour market pressures can make it difficult for social care employers to recruit and retain staff.
Geography also influences workforce recruitment. In rural areas, care workers often need to travel between people’s homes to provide support. Where public transport is limited, workers may need access to a personal vehicle to take up these roles. This requirement can limit the pool of potential staff and make recruitment more difficult for rural providers.
The report also highlights the influence of commissioning and funding arrangements. Social care providers often have limited control over service pricing because fees are set through local authority commissioning processes. When funding levels are constrained, providers may struggle to improve pay, invest in training or create more stable working conditions.
From a health and social care equity perspective, workforce shortages can affect the availability and quality of care services. Areas that face greater recruitment challenges may experience reduced service capacity or higher staff turnover, which can affect continuity of care for people receiving support.
Overall, the report suggests that improving recruitment and retention will require coordinated action across workforce policy, funding arrangements and labour market conditions. Addressing these issues is important for building a sustainable social care workforce and ensuring equitable access to care services across different regions.
A qualitative study exploring how low-paid health and social care workers understood their treatment by policymakers and government during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This study sheds light on how low-paid health and social care workers interpreted their place within the UK’s pandemic response. Participants described feeling overshadowed by a dominant focus on the NHS, with social care framed as secondary despite its central role.
The rapid and repeated changes to guidance intensified workplace stress. For many workers, the lack of stability compounded existing frustrations linked to low pay and insecure conditions, shaping how they understood government priorities.
In terms of care equity, the findings point to structural imbalances within the workforce. When social care workers are consistently positioned as lower priority, this reinforces inequalities between sectors and undermines the status of roles that are disproportionately occupied by women and people from marginalised backgrounds. These dynamics have implications not only for workers’ wellbeing, but also for the quality and continuity of care.
Overall, the paper highlights how crises can magnify longstanding workforce inequities. Addressing pay, recognition and inclusion in decision-making is essential if social care workers are to be treated as equal partners within the health and care system, rather than an afterthought during periods of national pressure.
A mixed-methods study examining the quality of working life, wellbeing and coping strategies of health and social care workers in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This study provides a detailed account of how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the working lives of health and social care staff. It documents high levels of burnout, declining mental wellbeing and the cumulative impact of sustained pressure during crisis conditions. Participants described how staffing shortages and job insecurity intensified workloads and reduced the capacity of services to meet demand. These pressures also affected morale and the ability of workers to provide the quality of care they aspired to deliver.
From a care equity perspective, the findings highlight how workforce strain can deepen inequities within care systems. Workers in lower-paid or less secure roles faced greater exposure to stress and burnout, while service users experienced variable support depending on staffing levels and workforce stability. These dynamics risk reinforcing uneven experiences of care across settings.
Overall, the study stresses the importance of workforce wellbeing as a foundation for equitable care. Addressing mental health, pay and staffing issues is essential not only for supporting workers, but for sustaining fair and reliable health and social care services in the longer term.
A national overview of the adult social care sector and workforce in England, including recruitment, retention, pay, demographics and training.
Key statistics
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This report provides a comprehensive snapshot of the adult social care workforce in England, highlighting the scale and persistence of recruitment and retention challenges. High turnover and continued reliance on international recruitment underscore the fragility of workforce supply.
The demographic profile of the workforce is striking. A predominantly female workforce, combined with variations in pay and progression, points to long-standing structural issues in how care work is valued and rewarded. These patterns shape both workforce stability and career sustainability.
From a care equity perspective, the findings raise questions about who bears the burden of workforce instability. Low pay, high turnover and limited progression disproportionately affect groups already overrepresented in the sector, including women and migrant workers. These have consequences for continuity, quality and fairness of care for people who rely on services.
Overall, the report highlights that addressing workforce shortages is not only about numbers. Improving equity in pay, conditions and opportunity is central to building a stable adult social care workforce and ensuring that care is delivered consistently and fairly across England.
A study examining care work in residential homes for older people, focusing on working conditions, care routines and the relationship between workforce culture and quality of care.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This study provides a detailed account of how care work is organised and experienced within residential homes for older people. By focusing on everyday routines and interactions, it shows how care quality emerges from the interaction between resources, organisational culture and staff practice.
The findings emphasise that good care is not solely a function of individual commitment. Workforce culture and material conditions shape what care workers are able to do, how time is prioritised and how responsibilities are distributed across teams.
From a care equity perspective, the study highlights how under-resourcing and time constraints can create uneven care experiences for residents. When staff are required to ration time or negotiate unclear responsibilities, some residents may receive more attentive care than others. These dynamics reflect broader inequities in how care is funded and organised, rather than individual failings of workers.
Overall, the paper stresses the importance of viewing workforce conditions as central to equitable care. Ensuring fair allocation of time, clarity of roles and adequate resources is essential if residential care homes are to provide consistent and dignified care for all residents.
A qualitative study exploring the priorities, experiences and progress of paid care worker organising in England, with a focus on pay, conditions and worker voice.
Key messages
Policy implications
Gaps
Commentary
This study provides insight into how paid care workers in England understand their working conditions and the role of organising in addressing long-standing challenges. Participants described organising as both a response to low pay and poor conditions and a way of asserting professional identity within a marginalised sector.
The findings show that care workers often feel disconnected from decision-making structures that shape their work. Organising activities were framed as efforts to make everyday realities visible to employers and policymakers, rather than solely as formal union activity.
Considering care equity, the study highlights how unequal power within the workforce affects both workers and the people they support. When care workers’ voices are excluded from policy and practice, inequities in pay, security and conditions are sustained. These workforce inequities have downstream effects on continuity and quality of care, particularly in a sector employing large numbers of women and people from marginalised groups.
Overall, the paper suggests that supporting care worker voices is not only a labour issue but a care issue. Strengthening avenues for collective input may contribute to fairer working conditions and a more equitable and stable care system.
